Custom Query (2447 matches)
Results (22 - 24 of 2447)
Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
---|---|---|---|---|
#277 | WorksForMe | Wrong connected seeds | ||
Description |
As you can see from the screen there are 2 available seeders and I'm connected to many more .. |
|||
#248 | Invalid | Wrong arguments to GtkFileChooser.set_current_folder() | ||
Description |
Using r3188, restarted the gui and got this. [DEBUG ] config:117 Setting 'enabled_plugins' to -1 of <type 'int'> Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/deluge/ui/gtkui/gtkui.py", line 182, in _on_new_core component.start() File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/deluge/component.py", line 194, in start _ComponentRegistry.start() File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/deluge/component.py", line 114, in start self.start_component(component) File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/deluge/component.py", line 126, in start_component self.components[name].start() File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/deluge/ui/gtkui/addtorrentdialog.py", line 132, in start self.update_core_config() File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/deluge/ui/gtkui/addtorrentdialog.py", line 170, in update_core_config self.set_default_options() File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/deluge/ui/gtkui/addtorrentdialog.py", line 360, in set_default_options self.glade.get_widget("button_location").set_current_folder( TypeError: GtkFileChooser.set_current_folder() argument 1 must be string, not bool apps file failure |
|||
#42 | WontFix | Writes and Reads reduction. | ||
Description |
I've noticed that Deluge 0.5.8.4 keeps flushing the data back to the drive almost immidiately after it receives it. It also seems to read data for uploading as it's needed. With just one torrent going 100KB/s down and 50KB/s up my HDD LED keeps flashing like crazy. This is very taxing for hard drives. Please make an option available to have the data flushed less frequently (like a slider with some reasonable values and a reasonable default value, say 2MB). This would reduce writes. Also, some sort of intelligent and more RAM-heavy (hey, RAM is cheap and it could be optional) uploading mechanism would be in order. Like buffering more data at once, I'm not sure how the protocol works, but parts that have most demand could be pre-emptively cached or/and if there's some sort of a queue, parse who needs what in advance and cache this data in bigger chunks in preperation before sending it. This would reduce reads. |